President Obama self-quarantines, will avoid contact with candidates Monday and Tuesday

The man who has spent the last 6 years with the Reverse Midas Touch; the man who declared 2010 would be a lot better than 1994 because the Democrats had him; the man who thinks the Democrats are going to lose this time because they are running away from his policies; that man is going to be “busy” on Monday before the election and Election Tuesday, so he won’t be stumping for Democrats…

Dana Loesch reports unhinged hater hoping her ‘kid gets blown up by some Republican loony’

Anti-gun, pacifist, “religion of peace” enabling, “feminist” in action. This is the Left.

‘Absolute clusterf—.’ Did the CDC just get caught deleting embarrassing Ebola pages from its website? (Hint: yes)

In Soviet Russia, they deleted people from photographs. In 1984, they deleted history. But in the Obama administration… wait, they’re doing it too.

It takes just two (buried) generic ballot polls to prove CBS’ Dem lapdoggery; It’s enraging

Some call it bias. I have called it agenda-driven since 1982. I was a high school student back then.

‘Risked my life for the country’: Netanyahu responds in wake of reported ‘chickensh*t’ insult

Obama and his lackeys call Bibi chickensh!t. Bibi smacks them down, in adult fashion.

If you thought the NARAL ‘Sweet Pea’ radio ad on Cory Gardner was bad, wait until you see the TV version! [video]

NARAL goes nutsy cuckoo (I know, already there) and makes outrageously stupid claims in an ad they are spending nearly half a million dollars to air. Desperation smells like NARAL flop sweat.

‘Who’s ‘chickensh*t’ again?’ After Bibi smear, WH spanked with cold truth [photos]

Senior Obama Administration official, anonymously calls a world leader who is fighting a neverending battle for his country’s very survival a coward, using vulgar, street terminology. And American Jews will continue to overwhelmingly support the very people who want them and theirs dead and long forgotten. The Lord was right when He called His Chosen a very stiff-necked people.

Taking Their Chains Off

HT OLLPOH

Surely they have been called Uncle Toms, Race Traitors, Oreos, House Ni**ers, Tokens, etc by the Left already.

We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Voter ID

Just so we’re clear, for those who choose not to follow the link, a Republican running for office tried to vote for himself and other Republicans on the ballot. The voting machine in Cook County Illinois (that’s Chicago) put all his votes for the Democrat, including the guy who he is running against. “No evidence of vote fraud” you liars from the Left (Perry Hood of Lewes Delaware and all Democrat officials) claim? Liars gotta lie.

hogewash

After all, vote fraud is so rare, especially in places like Cook County.

View original post

‘You need to tell his poor wife!’ Wendy Davis’ race-baiting about Greg Abbott is an epic fail

Wendy Davis, who attacked a wheelchair-bound man so outrageously that even members of the Left were outraged, and who has declared Voter ID to be a “poll tax” (her words), has declared that Greg Abbott must be racist since the man who is married to a Latina “won’t say if he would defend a ban on inter-racial marriages”. Abortion Barbie is getting super-duper desperate, and trying to play all the outrage cads she can, to… to what end, I cannot imagine. It sure isn’t to win over any actual, you know, votes.

Slip, Sliding Away

This is further evidence this whole Homosexual Marriage thing has been a farce to begin with. As RS McCain pointed out, it is to destroy marriage. It is also to destroy Christianity. But both will fail the anti-Christian zealots.

hogewash

You remember all that talk about how legalizing gay marriage wouldn’t require priests, ministers, or rabbis to conduct same-sex marriage ceremonies in violation of their religious beliefs. There wasn’t going to be any slippery slope, or so we were told.

Two ministers in Idaho are facing up to 6 months in jail and up to $1000 in fines for each day that they continue to refuse to perform a same-sex wedding that a gay couple requested last Friday.

View original post

Click, Read, Get MAD As Hell

http://www.google.com/patents/CA2741523A1?cl=en

Fall Trees

I Will Flat Out Say It

Ebola spreading is Obama’s Fault. Once known, he did what he always does – NOTHING. That is until people are screaming. This now is BO’s 9-11.

More than 100 monitored for Ebola symptoms in Ohio
<a href=”http://www.aol.com/article/2014/10/18/more-than-100-monitored-for-ebola-symptoms-in-ohio/20980422/?icid=maing-grid7%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl2%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D548039″>http://www.aol.com/article/2014/10/18/more-than-100-monitored-for-ebola-symptoms-in-ohio/20980422/?icid=maing-grid7%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl2%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D548039</a&gt;

They are NOT saying the 100 have it, but the nurse from TX is the reason. My feeling the Government is NOT on top of this and all this is doing is spreading fear. A rumor moves at the speed of light, the Truth crawls, and BO blames everyone else. Beat me up, I’ve been through more shit than I would wish on anyone. The Editor can CONFIRM.

Ferguson, and Michael Brown: Why the proximate facts of the shooting don’t matter …

… really, to the Activist Left.

With the most recent publication of the New York Times article on the Grand Jury findings and the likely Justice Department decision not to prosecute Officer Darren Wilson for the shooting of Michael Brown, it would seem that with a large portion of the uncertainty surrounding this event dissipating, so too would the causes for emotional inflammation lessen at least proportionally.

The Times reports:

“The officer, Darren Wilson, has told the authorities that during the scuffle, Mr. Brown reached for the gun. It was fired twice in the car, according to forensics tests performed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The first bullet struck Mr. Brown in the arm; the second bullet missed.

The forensics tests showed Mr. Brown’s blood on the gun, as well as on the interior door panel and on Officer Wilson’s uniform.

Officer Wilson told the authorities that Mr. Brown had punched and scratched him repeatedly, leaving swelling on his face and cuts on his neck. This is the first public account of Officer Wilson’s testimony to investigators …”

So,  Officer Wilson’s testimony does at this point seem consistent with the forensic results.

But, says the Times, “ … it does not explain why, after he emerged from his vehicle, he fired at Mr. Brown multiple times.”

Now let’s just stop here for a moment and consider where we are even if we discount not only Piaget Crenshaw and Tiffany Mitchell’s versions of the encounter at the police car, but also Dorian Johnson’s potential “spin”.  After all, Dorian Johnson was an accomplice in Michael Brown’s moments-before robbery of Ferguson Market and Liquors . So, just for the sake of argument, let’s also suppose that Johnson’s version of Officer Wilson’s reaching up and out through the police SUV window, and grabbing the 6’4″ tall, 300 lbs,  Michel Brown by the scruff of the neck with one hand , and drawing him back into the police vehicle in order to shoot him, is discounted.

Let’s suppose instead, and based on videotaped fact quite reasonably, that Brown, highly conscious of the strong arm robbery he had just perpetrated, and of the success he had just had in assaulting and technically battering the store clerk into submission during the robbery, figured he would try the same technique on the cop who was trying to tell him to get out of the middle of the road and to stop blocking traffic; a cop who in returning to deal with Brown’s refusal, and while in radio contact with headquarters, would in all probability become more curious regarding Brown’s recent activities and current motives.

Let’s suppose then, that Wilson is telling the substantial truth: that Michael Brown, knocking Officer Wilson back into the SUV as he attempted to emerge, went himself partly in through the car door window in order to batter Wilson into submission. And, that during the course of Brown’s battering Wilson, Wilson and Brown struggled for control of Wilson’s gun, and that, as the forensics show, the gun was discharged twice in the vehicle, spattering the vehicle interior as well as Brown and Wilson, with blood from Brown’s arm.

At which point Brown wounded once in the arm, takes off running; and Wilson, battered about the head and face emerges from the vehicle in pursuit.

Ok …

The first point to make here is that many on the left would object to Wilson shooting Brown under any circumstances: even to save his life in the midst of a potentially life or death struggle.

How do we know this? We know this, because in what they are positing as roughly parallel cases, wherein there was perhaps even  more existential provocation for shooting an assailant, such as for instance, having your head smashed on a concrete walk, leftists and race hustlers have in fact vehemently objected.

In the specific instance just now referenced, the case of Zimmerman-Martin, even after it was demonstrated through imagery, and geometrically, and through the testimony of Trayvon Martin’s so-called “girlfriend”, that Trayvon had to have doubled back on Zimmerman in order to assault him; even after Zimmerman’s bloody skull and broken nose were finally shown to the public; even after the ballistics showed that Zimmerman shot up into Trayvon’s chest while, or virtually while, being battered by Trayvon, the blase’ response of the left – agreed to by our friend the Old Gap Bridger for another example – was that Zimmerman had earlier invaded Trayvon’s space, deserved an assault and battery in response, and should therefore have “taken his beating like a man”.

In other words, to some on the left who still like to pose as fellow citizens instead of declaring as outright enemies, it doesn’t matter if you are being maimed or killed by a member of the imagined victim class. You are to passively suffer it; or maybe, flee. The victim classes’ “right” to inflict mayhem on you, trumps your very right to life.

Now in the case of Officer Wilson and Michael Brown, it is apparent, even according to our hypothetical scenario here, that Brown was shot multiple more times after Officer Wilson drove off Brown’s initial attack.  This additional shooting occurred after Officer Wilson extricated himself from the vehicle and, as was his duty, set off in hot pursuit of the man who had mere seconds before been battering him.

It is at this juncture that (generalizing) a further supposition of the activist left comes into play.  Already under their scheme of things, you are presumed to be obligated to to suffer a beating at the hands of a member of an official victim class without responding with fatal or potentially fatal force. At the very least, the moment any such assailant pauses in his attack on you,  he is presumed immune from any retaliation.

In the specific case of Brown and Wilson, Brown (under our assumed scenario) having unsuccessfully attempted to batter and or kill Officer Wilson in Wilson’s car, was fleeing the failed attempt, and thereby had under collectivist moral sensibility become immune from the leveling of deadly force in retaliation. It would not matter if Brown had just 5 seconds before gouged Wilson’s left eye out and ripped off his right ear. As the leftist activist sees it, the perpetrator is morally immunized [legally is another matter] from physical retaliation through the act of flight.

Furthermore, even if Brown ceased flight, not in order to surrender, but only to resume his assault under the transparent pretext of pretending to surrender, the left would still assert that to kill the assailant prior to a repeat of physical contact, no matter how many warnings to halt were given, was “unjust”.

Why?

The reason is that under their scheme of interpretation, neither Wilson, nor Zimmerman, nor any other person not a member of an official victim class, is even entitled to self-defense.  More broadly, no one is under the leftist system, actually.  But this most especially applies to all such people already considered guilty of capitalism, and economic privilege, and of engaging in the pursuit of self-interest. Those, thinks the leftist, of this bourgeois kind, who are not yet the recipients of an assault or battery or murder, are only awaiting their turn at a proper fate.

Unfortunately this attitude, more broadly predicated and subtly construed, at least superficially, has been creeping steadily into law over some generations now.

There can, it is plain, be no real reasoning across this kind of moral gulf.

One can only resist, or submit.