Truth Before Dishonor

I would rather be right than popular

A “birther” accusation against Obama that is more difficult to ignore

Posted by DNW on 2012/03/01


 

 

The controversial but popular Drudge Report has linked to  articles both on the more controversial and less popular World Net Daily site, and to the Washington Times, which is reporting on the results of Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s agreement to entertain the complaint of a number of Arizona citizens regarding Obama’s eligibility to appear on the ballot in that state.

 

Although  Arapaio has been careful to refrain from rendering a negative judgment on Obama’s status as a “natural born citizen”,  the analysis presented on World Net Daily (and Youtube) of at least one document pertaining to Obama’s life story,  is interesting enough to cause one to do an actual double take … as the case against the validity of Obama’s selective service card post office stamp, seems to be so convincingly argued.

Let’s hope that an example of a 1980 post office stamp from Hawaii is found with what looks like a two digit segment of a 2008 stamp, which has been excised and then placed into a stamp holder upside down so as to poorly mimic the last two digits of what should have been a 4 digit year stamp. And let’s hope that such a maverick stamp is discovered sooner rather than later.

 

 

 

About these ads

4 Responses to “A “birther” accusation against Obama that is more difficult to ignore”

  1. AOTC said

    interesting. i googled this and found little… its as though no-one wants to touch it with a ten foot pole.

    the matter has been sealed….

    in a mayioinaise jar…………..

    on funk and wagnalls porch since since noon on friday. heh

    it’s like it has magically become a topic no one should discuss, think about, or even utter unless you say exactly what is written in the book of liberal narratives has deemed shall be said…[ it shall come to pass that no one in the land will ever again bring forward the parchments of birth, and if they shall ,all men and women of the land, shall hide their gaze from them, for in that day their eyes will burn like hot coals in their orbits…..

    good grief. lol

    Like

  2. Yorkshire said

    I think the Sheriff has taken the harder point to prove, unless it is true, and the forgerer steps forward and has a conscience and is hiding in plain sight. The better avenue to pursue is the natural born citizen angle. If the late 1800’s SCOTUS ruling is a real indicator, the BC has all the information we need. BO’s father was a citizen under British rule by being born in the British controlled Kenya. And for Shiggles on some paperwork, BO is listed as Barack Obama II (British term) instead of Junior (An American term).

    Like

  3. DNW said

    Yorkshire said
    2012/03/04 at 23:02

    I think the Sheriff has taken the harder point to prove, unless it is true, and the forgerer steps forward and has a conscience and is hiding in plain sight. The better avenue to pursue is the natural born citizen angle. If the late 1800′s SCOTUS ruling is a real indicator, the BC has all the information we need. BO’s father was a citizen under British rule by being born in the British controlled Kenya. And for Shiggles on some paperwork, BO is listed as Barack Obama II (British term) instead of Junior (An American term).”

    That all might be.

    Though I have never believed that Obama was not born in the United States, I would not be at all surprised to find out 20 years from now that he was not, and that he was not was known by both him and his supporters. In fact many on the left would be more than happy to see the Constitution subverted, and not only a foreigner “rule” over us, but one with large powers of decree, joined by a “parliament” with unlimited sovereignty extending to matters of daily life and death.

    This is no news to us.

    If the date stamp could be shown to be impossible and thus fabricated, it would prove nothing but that a fraud had been perpetrated by someone acting for the White House. But explaining why the fraud had been perpetrated and by whom would be where it gets interesting.

    Like

  4. Yorkshire said

    DNW
    If the date stamp could be shown to be impossible and thus fabricated, it would prove nothing but that a fraud had been perpetrated by someone acting for the White House. But explaining why the fraud had been perpetrated and by whom would be where it gets interesting.

    The Sheriff said they have a “person of interest” (why can’t they just say ‘suspect’ instead of the newspeak?) I’d say go get him/her and question them.

    Like

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 220 other followers

%d bloggers like this: